FUTURECHURCH
and CALL TO ACTION’S
“BETTER
CHURCH” AND WORLD!
ONE OF THE GREAT
TRAGEDIES OF OUR DAY, ACCORDING TO THE
RADICAL FUTURECHURCH CROWD, ALLOWED TO OPERATE FREELY THROUGH OUT OUR
DIOCESE BY OUR BISHOP, IS THAT SO MANY GAYS AND LESBIANS CANNOT GET MARRIED AND
FINNALLY GET RID OF THE STIGMA THAT SO MANY PIG-HEADED, STUPID AND PREJUDICED HUMAN
BEINGS HAVE HAD AGAINST THEM FOR THOUSANDS OF YEARS. SO WE ARE STUPID,
PREJUDICED AND PIG-HEADED?
Our Lady’s Message of Garabandal October 18, 1961
“We must
make many sacrifices, perform much penance, and visit the Blessed
Sacrament frequently. But first we
must lead good lives. If we do not,
a chastisement will befall us. The
cup is already filling up, and if we
do not change, a very great chastisement will come upon us.” June 18, 1965 “As My
message of October 18 has not been
complied with and has not been
made known to the world, I am advising you that this is the last
one. Before the cup was filling
up. Now it is flowing over. Many
Cardinals, many Bishops and many priests are on the road to perdition and
are taking many souls with them.
Less and less importance is being given to the Eucharist. You should turn the wrath of God away
from yourselves by your efforts. …I
love you very much and do not want your condemnation. …Think
about the passion of Jesus. www.Garabandal.us
The scene: City Hall in San
Francisco . . . AND SOON COMING TO YOUR TOWN?
The clerk at the marriage license counter says, "Next."
"Good morning. We want to apply
for a marriage license."
"Names?"
"Tim and Jim Jones."
"Jones? Are you related? I see a resemblance."
"Yes, we're brothers."
"Brothers? You can't get married."
"Why not? Aren't you giving
marriage licenses to same gender couples?"
"Yes, thousands. But we haven't had any siblings. That's incest!"
"Incest?" We're not
gay."
"Not gay? Then why do you want to get married?"
"For the financial benefits, of course. And we love each other.
"But we're issuing marriage licenses to gay and lesbian couples who've
been
denied equal protection under the law. If
you are not gay, you can get
married to a woman."
"Wait a minute. A gay man has
the same right to marry a woman as I have.
But just because I'm straight
doesn't mean I want to marry a woman. I want
to marry Jim."
"And I want to marry Tim, Are
you going to discriminate against us just
because we are not gay?"
"All right, all right. I'll give you your license. Next."
"Hi. We are here to get
married."
Copy and Distribute this and our other literature in
your parishes and to all those you know! If you wish to recover your own faith and experience
the power and presence of God in your life join this battle for truth, the
Church and our Lord Jesus! All Glory be to Our Father, His Son
and the Holy Spirit!
"Names?"
"John Smith, Jane James, Robert
Green, and June Johnson."
"Who wants to marry whom?"
"We all want to marry each
other."
"But there are four of
you!"
"That's right. You see, we're
all bisexual. I love Jane and Robert, Jane
loves me and June, June loves Robert
and Jane, and Robert loves June and
me. All of us getting married
together is the only way that we can express
our sexual preferences in a marital
relationship."
"But we've only been granting licenses to gay and lesbian couples."
"So you're discriminating
against bisexuals!"
"No, it's just that, well, the traditional idea of marriage is that it's
just for couples."
"Since when are you standing on
tradition?"
"Well, I mean, you have to draw the line somewhere."
"Who says? There's no logical
reason to limit marriage to couples. The more
the better. Besides, we demand our
rights! The mayor says the constitution
guarantees equal protection under
the law. Give us a marriage license!"
"All right, all right. Next."
"Hello, I'd like a marriage
license."
"In what names?"
"David Deets."
"And the other man?"
"That's all. I want to marry myself."
"Marry yourself? What do you mean?"
"Well, my psychiatrist says I
have a dual personality, so I want to
marry the two together. Maybe I can
file a joint income-tax return."
The clerk looks past Mr. Deets and sees a tall, slender man leading a
female sheep on a leash. He throws a stack of papers into the air and
yells, "That does it! I quit! You people are making a mockery of
marriage!"
WHEN
EACH OF OUR CONSCIENCES BECOMES THE ULTIMATE MORAL GUIDE THEN MUTUAL CONSCENT
BECOMES THE ULTIMATE MORAL LAW. FutureChurch’s
world is already here (See Below)AND IS BEING WELCOMED INTO THE
CLEVELAND DIOCESE.
![]()
BreakPoint with Charles Colson Commentary
#040319 - 03/19/2004
See “Cleveland
Diocese Attack on Christian Marriage!” and “Diocese Attacks Passion of Christ but Celebrates Gay
Pride!” on our website www.saveourchurch.org under “Latest Scandals.” Then make sure
you let the Bishop know how you feel about seeing your Church destroyed! (Phone
numbers are listed for the Bishop and all the auxiliary Bishops at this
site). This Diocese should not be getting one
more cent from any Catholic until this Bishop is removed!
Consenting
Adults Responding
to a Cannibal
Three years ago in Germany, Armin Meiwes placed a personal ad on the Internet, seeking "a young, well-built man who wants to be eaten."
That's twisted all by itself, but it's not the worst part of the story. The worst part is that someone answered the ad.
Bernd Brandes, a man who is said to have had an obsession with pain, allowed himself to be killed and eaten by Meiwes. As a psychiatrist later determined, Meiwes had severe "emotional problems," and last month, he was sentenced to eight-and-a-half years in prison.
But some argue that he didn't commit a crime. In fact, the case raises some very disturbing questions for a society like Germany's and ours. The idea of an unchangeable moral law given by God has been abandoned. The idea today is that we're autonomous-we're free to do whatever we want, as long as we don't hurt somebody else. That puts us in an awkward position when we try to determine just what Meiwes did wrong. By what standard can a modern secularist argue that Meiwes did anything wrong?
But didn't Meiwes hurt Brandes? That depends on whom you ask. Meiwes's lawyer argued that this was a case of "killing on request.” Brandes wished to die, and Meiwes accommodated him. In Holland and in Oregon, for that matter, it is legal to help fulfill such a wish.
Perhaps the secularist could say that he finds killing and cannibalism repulsive. But that's no argument. Some pro-choice activists, when pressed, will admit that they find a procedure like partial-birth abortion repulsive. But they'll fight for it because they believe any restrictions on abortions are a blow to their personal autonomy. So how can they object to the way these two men exercised their personal autonomy, even if it was repulsive?
Columnist and physician Theodore Dalrymple makes exactly this point in City Journal. Dalrymple writes, "Meiwes and Brandes were consenting adults: By what right, therefore, has the state interfered in their slightly odd relationship? Of course, one might argue that by eating Brandes, Meiwes was infringing on his meal's rights, and acting against his interests. But Brandes decided that it was in his interests to be eaten, and in general we believe that the individual, not the state, is the best judge of his own interests."
Once we stop believing in the sanctity of human life, or in the dignity of each person created in the image of God, or in an absolute moral law, how can we argue with an individual's decision to throw away his own life? How can we ask the state to step in to protect his life, to save him from himself?
I'm reminded of the U.S. Supreme Court decision Planned Parenthood v. Casey, in which Justice Kennedy famously wrote, "At the heart of liberty is the right to define one's own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life.” Armin Meiwes and Bernd Brandes took that morally bankrupt definition of liberty to its logical -if extreme and repulsive- conclusion. And the frightening part is that a world that has largely abandoned the Christian worldview has no meaningful response to give to them.
For printer-friendly version, simply visit www.breakpoint.org and click on Today's Commentary. The printer-friendly link is on the left-hand column.
Copyright (c) 2004
Prison Fellowship
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Urgent Call for
Action! We are calling for serious prayer and fasting
for the removal of our Bishop and calling upon all concerned Catholics in
this Diocese to withhold all giving to this Diocese until this Bishop resigns
his office. The
leadership in the Cleveland Diocese has proven time and time again to be
totally incapable of spiritual leadership by its years of scandalous
mismanagement, abuse of sex abuse victims and their families, ignoring and abusing
the Faithful and its ever increasing resistance to correction. Indeed that leadership is increasingly
participating in the outright destruction of our Church and its faith by not
only encouraging the enemies of the Church and their agenda in this diocese but
by actively obstructing and persecuting those who have attempted to maintain
the Catholic faith, obedience to the Holy Father and the Magisterium in this
Diocese. This persecution has included
priests themselves who have been effectively silenced by this abuse. In wake of this most tragic state of affairs
we are calling upon all the Faithful to join in three spiritual offences
against the entrenched and growing Forces of Darkness in this Diocese.
Check our web site for AN EXPOSURE
OF THE ANTI-CATHOLIC ORGANIZATION FUTURECHURCH and the latest scandals in our Diocese.
“Ecumenical
Not Heretical!”